Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2019 0:31:57 GMT
I don't think it is, for reasons I outlined above. That doesn't work for me because it shifts the focus from the general principle to one specific result of that principle. My motivation in crafting the rule was not to allow abortions. Rather my motivation was to enforce bodily autonomy for people. That this would allow abortions is a side effect, not the purpose of the rule. If that is your purpose than I can assure it will be misinterpreted by many Anything can be misinterpreted. It's not possible to draft a statement so clear that it can't be misinterpreted. That's what I did.
|
|