|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jan 25, 2019 20:26:24 GMT
No, it wouldn't negate Trevor's sacrifice because unlike Rogers (who never actually died in First Avenger and thus never sacrificed himself in First Avenger), Trevor did actually die in WW and thus did sacrifice himself in WW and if Trevor coming back in WW1984 is only temporary and at the end of WW1984 Trevor remains dead, then it doesn't negate Trevor's sacrifice in WW. So good try, but you fail again. It's amazing that despite it being explained to you a number of times, and various definitions shown to you, you still do not understand the definition of "sacrifice" Steve Rogers' life in the 1940s: No video recorders No microwave ovens No MRIs No GPS No mobile phones No voicemail No E-mail No digital cameras No Internet Steve Rogers' life in the 2010s: Video Recorders Microwave ovens MRIs GPS Mobile Phones Voicemail E-mail Digital Cameras Internet Looks life Steve Rogers' life has gotten much better since he woke up in 2011. Hardly an sacrifice at all. And like I've said before, claiming that Steve Rogers (who now lives in a world with many technological and medical advances that weren't available in the 1940s) made a sacrifice is an insult to the soldiers who actually lost their lives or limbs in World War II and other wars. Steve Rogers not only didn't make a sacrifice, but Steve Rogers life has actually improved a hell of a lot since he woke up in 2011.
|
|