|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Jan 30, 2019 19:06:52 GMT
Jackman never looked the part? LMAO.
jackman has now made wolverine iconic even more than ever, he never physically looked the part but had the acting and traits down. people will remember and respect wolverine. after what disney has done to RDJ in the iron man role? he is no jackman.
the difference is jackman got to act the hell out of the films and got better and better. what has mcu being doing with iron man?
Are mcu fanatic saying he looks fake after mcu movies are their play station games wolverine on the internet huh? so how will mcu adapt e is for exnticiton again? real xmen stories or disney jokey stories? what is mcu xmen about?
same old same old with you. all trash talk no intellectual substance. yawn
What is with FoX-Men fans keep asking for Disney to adapt the E for Extinction storyline? As if Fox done it way better...oh wait, they never did. E Is for Extinction is the first story arc in Grant Morrison's legendary run on New X-Men. It's a good story but, when re-read, it's clear to see that Morrison is finding his footing on the book. It's a bit overrated when the entirety of his (groundbreaking) run is considered. Even the title is a bit of a baffling non-sequitur. Yes, E is for Extinction... And? If they'd have dropped the E in extinction... It does roll off of the tongue though, and that, sadly, is likely why XMU fans are drawn to it. It also features many nameless and faceless mutants being murdered as does Fall of the Mutants, another go to story arc for XMU fans. If you go back even two year ago, not many hardcore XMU fans were even familiar with the story. Riot at Xavier's, which pits a younger, ultra-radical faction of Xavier's students against the more established X-Men, would be far more compelling thematically. There's also the fact that E Is for Extinction is exactly three issues in length. I would call it more of a set up for Imperial and New Worlds which followed and were much more satisfying stories.
|
|