|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Feb 12, 2019 20:51:13 GMT
So then it could be designed for something other than man? Or to persuade the credulous of the existence of a loving deity which does not really exist? I'm trying to confuse and muddle by ... asking for clarification? Have you thought this through? An insult is not an argument. As I told you before. One need not know who designed something or why it was designed in order to ascertain that it is a product of design. These questions naturally follow but answering them is not vital to validate the conclusion that an intelligent design exists. So then: what would unintelligent design look like? Would it be, perhaps a process which leaves most of everything cold and dark, unable to sustain life? Or the poor attempt at designing the human knee or backbone, say? Or a process which expects appreciation but yet fails to leave evidence compelling enough for many to recognise it? Lack of answers to obvious questions noted.
|
|