|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Feb 12, 2019 21:38:40 GMT
One need not know who designed something or why it was designed in order to ascertain that it is a product of design. These questions naturally follow but answering them is not vital to validate the conclusion that an intelligent design exists. So then: what would unintelligent design look like? Would it be, perhaps a process which leaves most of everything cold and dark, unable to sustain life? Or the poor attempt at designing the human knee or backbone, say? Or a process which expects appreciation but yet fails to leave evidence compelling enough for many to recognise it? Lack of answers to obvious questions noted. It looks like Erjen is unable, or unwilling, to distinguish between intelligent and unintelligent design. In which case how could he see any distinction between what is 'unintelligent' and something which, although the result of random processes, just works?
|
|