|
|
Post by The Lost One on Feb 12, 2019 22:53:19 GMT
I think that's an overstatement. Gospels etc are evidence, they are just not compelling evidence. If at all, it is weak evidence due to the uncertain origins, translations and interpretations of the gospels over time, particularly the gap between when Jesus was alleged to have existed and when they were written and then made 'mainstream' over hundreds and thousands (nearly 2) of years, as we assess the evidence today. No arguments there, was just doing a bit of nitpicking
|
|