|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Feb 13, 2019 10:04:24 GMT
So then: what would unintelligent design look like? Would it be, perhaps a process which leaves most of everything cold and dark, unable to sustain life? Or the poor attempt at designing the human knee or backbone, say? Or a process which expects appreciation but yet fails to leave evidence compelling enough for many to recognise it? Lack of answers to obvious questions noted. It looks like Erjen is unable, or unwilling, to distinguish between intelligent and unintelligent design. In which case how could he see any distinction between what is 'unintelligent' and something which, although the result of random processes, just works?By the time you wrote this I was probably driving to work. Do you know what work is? Have you ever been employed?
|
|