|
|
Post by captainbryce on Feb 13, 2019 16:37:01 GMT
Eucharistic Miraclesthat's some evidence but a lot of people will continue to deny anyways as like I have quoted before it seems to boil down to this for some people... Of course they would (and should) deny claims that cannot be validated. How can anyone take miracle claims seriously when none of them can be validated scientifically? There is a reason why none of these "miracles" are published in peer-reviewed articles and why they people who discovered miracles have not won any Nobel prizes. If something like this could be scientifically confirmed, it would change the world and revolutionize society. But that hasn't happened, which should be a pretty big clue that it's not real. so no matter what some people are shown, they simply refuse to believe, or maybe they don't want to because they are not living right and might be living in sin and don't want to change their ways etc. The quote is absurd and always has been. It doesn't validate faith as a reasonable proposition. It's also completely false! Explanation is ONLY possible for people who are not appealing to faith. Faith is the excuse people give for believing in things without a good reason. If you have a good reason for believing in something, you don't need faith! so basically there is some evidence for those who can see, but there might be a little doubt, so faith is still required on some level. If any faith is required all, then that's essentially an acknowledgement that whatever "evidence" exists is insufficient evidence. And if the evidence is insufficient to warrant belief, then the belief is unjustified. |
|
