|
|
Post by captainbryce on Feb 13, 2019 16:42:17 GMT
So then: what would unintelligent design look like? Would it be, perhaps a process which leaves most of everything cold and dark, unable to sustain life? Or the poor attempt at designing the human knee or backbone, say? Or a process which expects appreciation but yet fails to leave evidence compelling enough for many to recognise it? Lack of answers to obvious questions noted. It looks like Erjen is unable, or unwilling, to distinguish between intelligent and unintelligent design. In which case how could he see any distinction between what is 'unintelligent' and something which, although the result of random processes, just works?It's not just Erjen, no theist who believes in intelligent design has a valid argument for this. It is impossible for any theist who believes in intelligent design to describe what an undesigned thing would look like since they claim to see design everywhere. They have no frame of reference, so distinguishing a designed thing from an undesigned thing is futile, reducing their entire argument to nonsense.
|
|