|
|
Post by summers8 on Feb 27, 2019 9:42:08 GMT
iron man 3 was one of the first controversies marvel suffered with critics own credibility.
the movie was exposed beyond a scam, the story fell apart by the second arc and the mandarin twist brought down the entire film. iron man 3 was worse than X3 and would have been in the 50s on rt. if it was a fox, dc or sony film. like it or not, it is fact.
infact man of steel was a better effort than iron man 3. the wolverine was better than iron man 3 but in 2013 iron man 3 still had the highest rt score for a comic film. why? because it is an mcu movie.
fans and sane audiences expected critics to have held the movie more responsible and slammed the mandarin twist even harder than how X3 handle dark phoenix because it was handled far worse. but many critics chose not to do so.
this is just laughable, it will only get funnier when some mcu fans will still bring up rt in the future to prove mcu movies are good,
hey, look. rt is on full damage control.
Rotten Tomatoes president: We didn't change site to protect Captain Marvel
Only MCU fans will believe this lie.
um, yeah you do.
1. For all its Mandarin controversies, 'Iron Man 3' was still more consistent film than any of those you've mentioned, maybe aside from 'The Wolverine'. 2. These trolls have been attack unreleased films 4 times starting with 'Black Panther' with one of them having no reason to be attacked in such manner in the first place and another one being 10 months away from release. man of steel was more consistent hate or love it at least from the first arc or scene in the film you knew the direction. it a better made movie than iron man 3 with better writing to iron man 3.
people who want a movie to be judged on its own merit are not trolls. disney and the media are blurring this line to protect movies like black panther and captain marvel from any criticism other movies do get.
|
|