Rotten Tomatoes disgraced over Captain Marvel.

Blah. This sort of gross oversimplification strikes me as beneath someone as broad-minded as yourself, even if it's the largest contributing factor.

And while you're right about the sites being private and not obligated to afford their customers First Amendment rights, doing so and silencing consumers' ability to share their opinions about a corporate product is absolutely the definition of censorship and not a thing to be praised on the technicality that they're a private business; that distinction doesn't absolve them of the moral ramifications of their actions, just the legal ones. So addressing the latter doesn't mean you've successfully argued the former. You know?

ETA: er -- "innit"?