|
|
Post by Dirty Santa PaulsLaugh on Mar 16, 2019 1:30:29 GMT
I find it deeply disturbing that someone allegedly educated to the level of a PHD in a scientific field should make this claim. The “scientist” does not present his hypothesis; the steps taken to satisfy the hypothesis proof requirements; nor his conclusion to prove the hypothesis is correct. Neither has he offer up for others his experiment to test his claims. Until then, he’s not doing science. At best he could call it philosophy, but I doubt he could prove his philosophical supposition. But he has three big problems he must solve. 1. He must prove Jesus was an actual person who lived at a particular point in history. 2. Once he finds empirical evidence for this, then he must prove Jesus is really the son of God. 3. And to make “Jesus is the son of God” a true statement, he must prove there is a God.
|
|