True story or fake news: Big naked lady sits on a baby-poll now included

It appears at first that you're a glutton for being humiliated, but no doubt you and your crack head mob are seriously that deluded. Reality means nothing to you. It's a sign of the times. You and Donald Trump and all the other illiterate buffoons are now in charge with creating your culture of crack head reality as the basis of reality.

But I'll help you in your quest to be embarrassed again.

You are a poor communicator. It's that plain and simple. I make my posts so that there is no question of what any adverb or adjective refers to. You don't. You are totally incoherent. The first rule of communication is "communicating".  

Even before my edit, one knew what each adjective described, what each subject was in every phrase.

Anyone who says you communicate as well is outright lying. Period. 

Here's the quote you and Goz, in your crack head delusion, are so fond of. A quote you made. I didn't dig past the first page. I'm no stalker.
Of course no one can argue with that, because it is incoherent. It is impossible to figure out what you're trying to say. Bad enough that you won't use a comma, which is imperative in your third sentence, but the statement gives no indication of what your subject is, nor what you're trying to say.

First sentence:
You really think that is a coherent sentence? If you do, you're lying. What does "proving a negative" even mean? Well, it's an oxymoron. It's incoherent. It's definitive of poor English. That phrase alone will cause any honest teacher to flunk a third grader.

Then there's your phrase "prove the opposite using science". It's so garbled that it takes well over five seconds to go back and see what you're referring to, whether you mean "the scientific method" or "proving a negative". I'm not a mind reader, so you insist that is a disability.

I'm curious. Is "mind reading" the new human norm? I'm no mind reader, so if not being a mind reader is a "disability", I qualify. Maybe the majority of people who post here can read minds. Maybe you're correct. I need to know. I'm not a mind reader. I can only use logic. If you and Goz are gifted with ESP, then you are obviously poor stewards over that gift, because you're poor communicators.

Your second sentence has no poor grammar. It's just useless. You say "In this case it would be that God exists". Well, in what case? It's dependent on the incoherent sentence preceding it, so it's useless. Therefore, it says nothing. 

And then we have your third sentence:
The missing comma alone makes this impossible to read, so I'll add it and see if that helps:
No, doesn't help. I see why you left out the comma. "Science" is some entity that "accepts" something. Epic fail there, you have to admit. "The negative state is the true state". Another oxymoron that is impossible to decipher.


You cannot communicate. Goz claims she can read your mind. This does prove other posts I've made about supernatural forces working on humans. There's certainly nothing "natural" about Person A reading Person's B's mind just by reading incoherent babble written by Person B.