|
|
Post by moviemouth on May 17, 2019 6:19:24 GMT
His point still stands. That at least half the time the winners are chosen for reasons that have more to do with politics than actually being the best. Basically the reason I don't watch the Oscars anymore. Certainly, like when your boy Sean Penn won for turning Harvey Milk into a camp gay stereotype over the far superior Mickey Roarke who happened to be a Bush supporter. But Diane Keaton winning because her character was vaguely feminist? That's the kind of nutty, paranoid MRA sh*t that gets tiring on this board. And from what I can tell, you support her win, so what are we talking about here? All I was commenting on is that he has a point in not trusting the reasons for any choices the Oscars make. Whether I agree with certain wins or not is beside the point. I wasn't saying that Diane Keaton won because of politics specifically. Sean Penn probably did win because he is a liberal, but that has nothing to do with why he is my favorite lead male performance of that year. I don't much care what you find tiring.
|
|