Post by OpiateOfTheMasses on May 19, 2019 8:29:11 GMT
I started a thread about the abhorrent abortion laws being passed in places like Alabama and there was no shortage of believers here saying that the no matter what the child was innocent and had a right to be defended.
When I asked if that meant that they would support socialised medicine and large welfare payments for them all of a sudden they went quiet.
So which is it? Should we have laws ensuring the protection of defenseless children? Or only when it doesn't inconvenience you in any way?
When I asked if that meant that they would support socialised medicine and large welfare payments for them all of a sudden they went quiet.
So which is it? Should we have laws ensuring the protection of defenseless children? Or only when it doesn't inconvenience you in any way?