Less Than 8 Months Before Star Wars Fans Harass Naomi Ackie Off Instagram

Jun 7, 2019 19:29:56 GMT Rey Kahuka said:

Jun 7, 2019 19:22:32 GMT lenlenlen1 said:

No, because Hawkeye is also ridiculous in the Avengers universe. And Green Arrow is ridiculous in the DC universe.

Let me prove to you why bow's and arrow's are ridiculous in any reality where guns exist: Do you see any modern army still using them? If you want a silent weapon put a silencer on a gun/rifle. I rest my case. 

Bow and arrow is just used in movies because it LOOKS cool. But it doesn't REALLY make sense. While you're reaching for and arrow and pulling your bowstring, I'll have pulled my trigger several times.

A suppressor isn't anywhere near as quiet in real life as it is in the movies, let alone compared to a bow.  But you're right, bows for superheroes are antiquated.  It's a throwback to the golden age of Robin Hood stories and it just looks fun onscreen.      

It's true that a suppressor is not as quiet as movies make them out. But on a rifle from 100 yards away, I doubt you'd hear it at all.

Yes, the bow and arrow on superheroes is an old throwback. But, as with most old throwbacks, its one that needs to be re-addressed and modernized. For example, give the character other abilities to counter the low power level of a bow and arrow.

SNL did a great skit about the subject when Jeremy Renner hosted. In the skit the Avengers are about to go into action and Hawkeye simply runs out of arrows.

But even with the characters like Hawkeye and Green Arrow I'm willing to suspend my disbelief a little because those characters choose the bow and arrow because they're trying to find non-lethal methods of taking down criminals. They're trying to incapacitate, not kill. On a street level criminal it might be affective.

My problem comes in when they're up against Thanos and Galactus. Did you notice Hawkeye kicking much ass then?