Hard To Believe The Catholic Church Really Means It...
Jun 12, 2019 22:15:04 GMT
clusium and northern like this
Post by mslo79 on Jun 12, 2019 22:15:04 GMT
Well apparently there are many false abuse claims against the Catholic church... www.themediareport.com/2019/05/13/false-accsuations-against-catholic-priests-facts/
so while there are some legitimate claims, many are either exaggerated or a flat out lie. so if they changed laws to make it easier to sue the Catholic church, I would have to assume, given that articles info there, many more false claims would be made and that takes $ away from the church which would be used for good.
but since the general mainstream media is anti-Christian they will promote anything that makes Christianity (especially the Catholic church) look bad. but anything that makes Islam look bad they sweep under the rug. just shows you how corrupt they are when they attack what's proven good here (i.e. Christianity) and accept what's basically opposed to Christianity (i.e. Islam).
but with that said... it's a touchy subject as you want those legitimately abused to get some form of compensation but at the same time, people being people, they lie just to get $ etc which downplays those with legitimate claims. besides... say someone was abused 20-30-40 years ago and they make a claim, how can they prove it happened? ; because without proof, or at least something to strongly suggest it occurred etc, it's easy to see how people will abuse this as a $ opportunity. so without proof, or something pretty darn close to hard proof, you have to default to the 'innocent til proven guilty' thing. because once someone ignores that, those who are innocent will be convicted by accusation.
so while there are some legitimate claims, many are either exaggerated or a flat out lie. so if they changed laws to make it easier to sue the Catholic church, I would have to assume, given that articles info there, many more false claims would be made and that takes $ away from the church which would be used for good.
but since the general mainstream media is anti-Christian they will promote anything that makes Christianity (especially the Catholic church) look bad. but anything that makes Islam look bad they sweep under the rug. just shows you how corrupt they are when they attack what's proven good here (i.e. Christianity) and accept what's basically opposed to Christianity (i.e. Islam).
but with that said... it's a touchy subject as you want those legitimately abused to get some form of compensation but at the same time, people being people, they lie just to get $ etc which downplays those with legitimate claims. besides... say someone was abused 20-30-40 years ago and they make a claim, how can they prove it happened? ; because without proof, or at least something to strongly suggest it occurred etc, it's easy to see how people will abuse this as a $ opportunity. so without proof, or something pretty darn close to hard proof, you have to default to the 'innocent til proven guilty' thing. because once someone ignores that, those who are innocent will be convicted by accusation.