Post by mslo79 on Jun 13, 2019 0:23:16 GMT
goz
Put it this way, regardless of this particular subject... when someone is accused of a crime it's up to the person accusing them to produce proof. it's the whole 'innocent til proven guilty' thing and the way the law works.
so what's so disgraceful about that?
What a surprise!
A pathetic Catholic apologist trying to minimise the level of criminality amongst Catholic priests and the cover up for centuries AND blame the victims for not having 'evidence' to be credible. You are disgraceful.
A pathetic Catholic apologist trying to minimise the level of criminality amongst Catholic priests and the cover up for centuries AND blame the victims for not having 'evidence' to be credible. You are disgraceful.
Put it this way, regardless of this particular subject... when someone is accused of a crime it's up to the person accusing them to produce proof. it's the whole 'innocent til proven guilty' thing and the way the law works.
so what's so disgraceful about that?
that stuff cannot be ignored otherwise someone can simply accuse someone of a crime and they are guilty because a person said they were without any proof. that's how innocent people get screwed over. you can surely see this much, right?
p.s. while I might be biased for the Catholic church (I am because it's the true church of Jesus Christ and the one He started, which makes it good at it's very core, and while some of it's members can become corrupt, it's official teachings are the truth on morals etc which makes it good), your clearly biased against it (along with the mainstream media in general). that's why what I said above is best as it removes bias, for or against, and relies on facts/evidence instead of accusation. but you seem to rely more on accusations (i.e. guilt by accusation) which is a bad way of looking at serious stuff like this since that will get many innocents convicted. because many people lie or exaggerate things in general to where if they make a serious accusation, it's not unreasonable to be a bit hesitant to believe them without some reasonable level of evidence to support their claim. because with your mindset/reasoning... someone could simply accuse you of something serious and you would be convicted and, obviously, you would not like that.