|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Jun 20, 2019 11:06:25 GMT
Way too heavy-handed with the anti-Soviet propaganda. A lot of the characters come off as cartoonish caricatures. Would be interesting to see a Ukrainian- or Russian-written and produced version. My other main criticism is that the way they tell the story, the audience is left to believe that there were only two senior nuclear scientists (Legasov and Khomyuk) working on disaster management and the investigation into what went wrong in the first place, one of whom in the beginning was largely doing the latter investigation more or less on her own and in secret—super conspiracy-like. The idea that there would have been only two senior scientists working on managing the disaster response is utterly preposterous. 1. Russia sucks that bad now, so it's not too shocking they sucked in the 80's. Heck, that idiot Trump's administration behaves the exact same way, they just can't control the media or people's views. Further, they showed plenty of good people in Russia even if there was nothing worth praising bureaucracy wise and it's silly to defend that which we have know is true regarding the USSR. 2. It's a dramatic work, not a documentary and there has never been a biopic made that doesn't stream down the cast to make it easier for the audience. Unlike most, Chernobyl made that clear in discussion of the show, the podcast, & I think they showed pictures of them in the final episode.
|
|