|
|
Post by dnno1 on Jun 26, 2019 17:40:54 GMT
The consumer has lots of avenues to watch a movie. If it is just one film, he/she doesn't have to subscribe to multiple services. That person could just buy or rent the DVD or stream the movie though a service lice VUDU or Sling if they want. I have VUDU and I only have to pay for what I want to rent or own. Does Warner Media even have enough content to justify an entire streaming service? I get Disney doing their one service, since they basically own half of Hollywood at this point, but what does WB have to offer? thisguy4000, among HBO, Turner Networks, and Warner Brothers Pictures, Warner Media has one of the worlds largest library of entertainment. We are talking about original content coming from HBO (i.e. Game of Thrones, The Sopranos, Euphoria, The Watchmen, and others), Turner Networks (like Murder in the First and The Last Ship), Boomerang (old Warner Brothers, and Hanna Barbera Cartoons), Cartoon Network, and the vast library of films coming from the Warner Brothers movie vault. That's not to mention the new content that is produced each year.
|
|
