Post by Prime etc. on Jul 7, 2019 0:53:57 GMT
Why didn't they try to re-create Titanic's success?
Pearl Harbor came 4 years later.
Harry Potter was a corporation-created "success."
They selected Rowling and Potter to be the corporate artist and character for a new globalist media enterprise.
It's a UK version of Luke Skywalker except he is more inept.
Wouldn't be surprised if Rowling does a novel sequel where Harry goes tranny or Muslim or both.
Pearl Harbor came 4 years later.
Harry Potter was a corporation-created "success."
It wasn't audience-created. The studios have money.
It was different in the 1960s when you had many smaller companies which might pay attention to trends (lots of spy movies).
It's a UK version of Luke Skywalker except he is more inept.
Wouldn't be surprised if Rowling does a novel sequel where Harry goes tranny or Muslim or both.