|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Apr 23, 2017 15:31:47 GMT
They should push it. Because "they" are smart business executives whose job it is to make money for Disney's shareholders. But as a lifelong fan of comics in general, the announcement of a Guardians movie was the canary in the coal mine for me that they're basically scraping the bottom of the barrel at this point and putting lipstick on a gerbil. I would say lipstick on a pig, but Sony has rights to the pigs, and Fox has the rights to anything else with any actual legacy on which to draw that's worth adapting. Personally: I think the IP is trash, the characters are sixth-rate, the hipster/"cool" packaging is too cute by half, and the characters have no significant history in comics in which I possess even a shred of fan interest. So it's strange for me to see it succeed since I genuinely see nothing redeeming in "Guardians" on any level whatsoever; it's hack as fuck and represents what I perceive to be the worst aspects of both Hollywood in general and comic book movies specifically. But I'm sure others might say the same thing (for different reasons) about stuff I like, etc. etc. It wasn't scraping the bottom of the barrel at all. Are you serious? Guardians of the Galaxy was probably the most exciting announcement I'd ever heard. It's why we're getting Elders, why we might see the Watcher, why we're getting Adam Warlock. It was born out of the Annihilation Wave! No significant history? Nothing redeeming? Are you on crack?
No offense, but what kind of comic fan are you if that didn't excite the hell out of you?
|
|