|
|
Post by Isapop on Aug 25, 2019 18:46:14 GMT
Despite your massive attempts to shift the point to whether I can prove that you said something long ago, the fact remains that you don't deny that you remain unbaptized and that you cannot answer the point that I began with. accept that I am baptized So, it's all changed now? You got baptized as a Jehovah's Witness? That would have to be pretty recent, because here you are addressing me just this past February: "You of all people should realize I know more about the nuances of JW life since you seem to think I am one." And my reply: " I have lost count of the times that I have plainly told you that I know that you are not a JW even though you subscribe to their theology." IMDB2.freeforums.net/thread/153472/believing-family-shuns-leaving-church?page=2 And that's how it was, going back to the old board. BUT NOW, WE ON THIS BOARD SHOULD ACCEPT THAT YOU ARE BAPTIZED. This is a milestone! looking4klingons must be delighted that he can now call you "brother". And everyone else won't have to guess anymore when you make vague references to "my church" or cryptic hints about your theology.
(Oh, if it turns out you really aren't baptized, you'd best clear that up. Telling people to accept that you are baptized when you aren't isn't nice.)
|
|