Post by Arlon10 on Sept 5, 2019 11:41:40 GMT
Sept 5, 2019 2:15:34 GMT:
goz said: [full text here]<clips>
1 ... Since my aptitude for any of these areas in these mathematically based areas are unknown to you, this is a ridiculous statement, since your own proven aptitude when asked to solve statistical and mathematical problems on these Boards has been woefully inaccurate and filled with erroneous thinking. Thinking clearly can yet not necessarily be associated with mathematics.2 ... Which authorities will present what to me about what? If it is not today then can I assume it is sometime in the future like Armageddon?
1 Again, I follow a school, you follow a herd.
2 I would not hazard a guess what you might assume.
Your critical and devastating mistake is the assumption that any group of religious people necessarily failed science. Nothing could be further from the truth. In fact religious people with the obvious exception of Christians following Trump are actually far better at science.
Much like the "evangelical" Christians blindly follow their herd currently supposed to be led by Trump, your herd has a blind faith in science that leads to the acceptance of quite much that's really not science. You mistrust and refuse to credit real scientists because they are not members of your herd. The rather obvious mistake seen time and time again is the misunderstanding and misapplication of statistical analysis. You have still not, as far as I know, recognized the vast and significant difference between statistical analysis and actual science ceteris paribus. You and your herd are incapable of constructing convincing arguments and turn to the force of government to impose your beliefs on others, very much like Trump followers depend on the force of their dominance of government.
In fact however you know nothing at all of science and they know nothing at all of religion. There are no "schools" that teach statistical analysis is on par with science ceteris paribus. There are no "schools" that teach that facts are determined by dictionaries as you often try. It is just you and your lost herd.
It might serve you well to remember that "science" is not disputed by anyone, especially religious people. Real science is readily and easily tested. If it is in dispute then it is not readily and easily tested and is therefore not science, yet anyway.