Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2019 14:06:54 GMT
I don't believe "mistranslation" is fair. Few translations are perfect, even contemporaneous ones across countries. In a pre-industrial world "slavery" was an entirely different thing. Of course we all know exactly what "virgin" means anywhere or anytime, but there was likely some confusion about the story. It did appear to some people that the birth of Jesus was somehow miraculous or there would be no story. It might also be the case that the birth of JC had to be miraculous, supposedly worked to fulfill prophecies & etc - or there would be less of a story. It is a totally spurious link to a bit in Isiah, which was written about his time, not Jesus'... Besides that also says a young woman will give birth, not a virgin.
|
|