|
|
Post by moviebuffbrad on Oct 1, 2019 1:17:18 GMT
What's the actual thematic difference between Sidney's daughter being the killer, and Jill? It's the exact same concept, and the third killer that's family related to her in a row. And why should Wes Craven's son direct, besides being related to Wes Craven's? Textbook nepotism. A third family member becoming the new Ghostface seems to be repetitive. So who do you think should be the new Ghostface? Judy Hicks is one, a relative of Billy, Stu, Mrs. Loomis, Charlie? Or how about a secret accomplice of Roman's? The reason why I pick Sidney's daughter is because she's sick and tired of people pretending to be her friend when all they want to do is meet her mom. Unlike Jill, she doesn't want to be famous and become the new Sidney Prescott, she wants to be her own person. She doesn't want to be known as the daughter of a survivor. I picked Wes Craven's son because I feel like it would be continuing his legacy. It's still a young family member you expect to be the new Sidney revealed to be the killer, the motive is just inversed a bit. And if she doesn't want to be seen like her mom, how does being involved in another killing spree accomplish this goal? Out of those, a secret accomplice sounds the best, but I dont think the killer needs to be related to anybody. It could always just be a new character with a self-contained motive.
|
|