Post by rizdek on Oct 6, 2019 9:11:06 GMT
I wonder if this is for real...it sounds made up...especially the alleged firing note. It specifically says they are being fired for religious reasons.
[W]e can't tolerate religious privileges from anyone."
OTOH, maybe it was religious conviction that triggered the firing. If it's against your convictions to have someone working for you who doesn't like to attend your party because of religion, and if your party means a lot to you religiously, then you should be allowed to fire them if they are NOT coming because of their religion and that, even if you excuse others for NONreligious reasons. It's arbitrary and capricious, but isn't that what religion is at its roots? And no, they shouldn't have to explain the basis for that "religious" conviction that no one can be excused for religious reasons.
OTOH, maybe it was religious conviction that triggered the firing. If it's against your convictions to have someone working for you who doesn't like to attend your party because of religion, and if your party means a lot to you religiously, then you should be allowed to fire them if they are NOT coming because of their religion and that, even if you excuse others for NONreligious reasons. It's arbitrary and capricious, but isn't that what religion is at its roots? And no, they shouldn't have to explain the basis for that "religious" conviction that no one can be excused for religious reasons.