|
|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on Oct 8, 2019 10:36:36 GMT
If you can't sense it, then there's no particularly reason to believe it exists would be more accurate then you're terrible strawman. Which is an absurd position to take.
Dogs can 'sense' things humans can't. Does that mean what they sense doesn't exist. Lol
How is that absurd? It's one thing to say: "there are probably things that exist that we can't sense." That's actually true as we've developed devices that can measure things (sights, sounds, etc.) outside of our perceptual range; for example, there are frequencies higher than 20kHz that we can't hear, but dogs can. But it's another thing entirely to say: "THIS thing that we can't sense exists." When you say that, what evidence are you relying on? In the case with higher frequencies, we can measure them, and thus see them on measurement devices.
|
|