Post by Arlon10 on Oct 8, 2019 11:26:35 GMT
Which is an absurd position to take.
Dogs can 'sense' things humans can't. Does that mean what they sense doesn't exist. Lol
It's one thing to say: "there are probably things that exist that we can't sense." That's actually true as we've developed devices that can measure things (sights, sounds, etc.) outside of our perceptual range; for example, there are frequencies higher than 20kHz that we can't hear, but dogs can.
But it's another thing entirely to say: "THIS thing that we can't sense exists." When you say that, what evidence are you relying on? In the case with higher frequencies, we can measure them, and thus see them on measurement devices.
People rely on the testimony of others much of the time. It can be efficient. Do you deny you have?