|
|
Post by gadreel on Oct 16, 2019 18:59:37 GMT
Well at least now you are actually presenting something other than a vague "i dont agree" explorebiotech.com/10-bizarre-facts-fraternal-twins-probably-didnt-know/link
So I am not really sure what 'experts' you are referring too, but here are two saying that you are wrong, you are welcome to evidence expert commentary that refutes this if you like, but your assertions are not evidence. Cool, that is one study, and yes it can only be applied to the subject group, however that is not the only academic paper that posits a religosity gene:
www.lifescied.org/doi/full/10.1187/cbe.07-05-0029
And before you say it, no this is not proven but it there is enough feeling in the scientific community that your assertion that
Simply does not hold water, as there may well be.
Wow! You are really invested in this. See my previous answer to Amyghost I think it was and I will just rest my case thanks, your claim that there is absolutely no genetic component to religious belief is very clearly not one held by the scientific community, until you can present actual evidence to the contrary of what I have shown, then you are demonstrably incorrect.
|
|