Post by gadreel on Oct 17, 2019 3:21:30 GMT
Oct 17, 2019 3:18:57 GMT goz said:
FIRST you have to provide something that backs up your statement, I have you have not. Until you are able to back up what you claim (that 'There is no genetic disposition towards religion or faith', your exact words), all you are do
ing is making bold faced, unsupported assertions, and forgive me but I think I might have more faith in the actual supplied and peer-reviewed science than the assertions of someone on a message board who is incapable of supporting what they say.
Show me how those 'scientists' in this study defined 'religious'. I claim bullshit science at best done by 'believers'!
Where is the proof that these people in the 'study' were religious'? I repeat. There is no such trait as 'religious'.
I also don't accept studies because you claim that they are 'peer reviewed'.
I have provided overwhelming evidence, your refusal to accept what scientists are discovering is on you, not me.