|
|
Post by Winter_King on Oct 30, 2019 16:06:13 GMT
Mainly because due to a lack of evidence and the geographical region where Bigfoot is suppose to exist. In contrast, the Yeti, while there is also a lack of evidence, he's supposed to live in a remote geographical region which makes the lack of evidence more plausible even if does exist. I've always wondered about photos that supposedly show tracks towards the tops of remote mountain tops... While it is true, that anyone can make fake tracks... especially if they are fully determined to do so, no matter how hard it can be to do them... Most people climb mountains... TO CLIMB MOUNTAINS... They don't go there to fake Big Feet tracks. The act of climbing mountains is really too dangerous all by itself, to do anything else. And since they are remote locations, people won't create hoaxes to trick other people, because it is unlikely that anyone will find them... And so, while I said, some climbers might fake tracks to get fame... One has to ask the question, If they really did find tracks, that they did not create themselves... Then who or what made them? I'd assume that most mountain climbers are not experts in identifying footprints so it might simply be case of misidentification of another animal. A study made in 2013 by a British scientist tested what was supposed to be Yeti fur and concluded that the hairs were a match for a bear and that while there might be a an animal behind the legend, it will probably be something less spectacular than giant ape. Maybe an unknown subspecies of bear that lives in the region.
|
|