Post by Arlon10 on Nov 6, 2019 23:39:34 GMT
Nov 6, 2019 16:11:23 GMT:
FilmFlaneur said:[full text here]< clips >
1) nearly all of them would accept that evolution moves by successful increment and not by sudden complexities. Which was the point.
2) There are no observations that I know of
3) there is overwhelming scientific consensus about the modern evolutionary synthesis
4) And your superiority complex is showing again, as is a preference for insults over argument.
5) I think your relative lack of knowledge here has been dealt with already by others.
1) That would be a great point if we were discussing origin of species since already living things can afford to make small changes since they have developed strategies to protect those small changes from the environment. It would help if you were capable of developing a mental picture of what is being discussed. Lifeless matter has no means to protect any developments from the environment. That requires a large set of complex interrelated systems working together, which necessarily be developed all at once.
2) Is that another of your debating rules? Your rules are ridiculous.
3) No, but there is an overwhelming political consensus driven by people who, like you, have no idea what they are talking about. They refuse to address the real issue of the first life, just as you have here.
4) You have to let that go. It is not an argument. You are just as guilty of what you accuse others of doing.
5) See #4.