|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Nov 8, 2019 11:46:58 GMT
Read this, dumbass, and tell me how it's inaccurate. You make atheists look stupid. What about the verb "began" don't you understand? You went with Wikipedia, the "I know nothing but want a simple primer on a subject I don't understand" source. And you went with the one interpretation of the big bang which supported your claims, completely ignoring the fact that there are other interpretations, which I calmly explained to you in an earlier post. At least we got you to stop bringing up bullshit about a "prime mover", so that's progress. I suspect the first meaning of the "big bang" when the term was originally coined was "the" beginning. That there are "other interpretations" shows that the terminology is worthless. Most scientific speculation about the age of the Earth or how various things originated is also worthless. It's just mentally retarded people whining because religious discussions are over their ability to read. They're trying to "disprove" what religious people never took as hard fact anyway.
|
|
