|
|
Post by 尺ロㄈにモイ州凡几 on Nov 17, 2019 14:25:29 GMT
All they point out is the fact that *if* Myles Garrett hit him with a different spot of the helmet, then Rudolph would've been killed. And that's true. But it doesn't make what happened anymore violent than just playing the game. The issue isn't with the violence of the situation but the fact that it happened when it wasn't supposed to. Yes it does. As does the difference between doing something in the legal confines of the game for the purpose of a team's benefit as opposed to assaulting someone for a petty, personal fight. That's an argument for why he should've been punished, not an argument for why what he did was more violent than traditional football play.
|
|