Post by dazz on Nov 18, 2019 14:42:47 GMT
Yes because Everett Ross is the deputy commander of the joint counter terrorist unit, as in the people assigned under the UN to deal with the situation, key words in all of that are commander and joint, meaning he is a command position and he is in a position where he does infact have jurisdiction outside the US, and the forces sent to capture Bucky were under his orders.
The fact that this is a UN (i.e. international) operation makes it even MORE LIKELY that Bucky will get a trial. Because international organizations like the UN love big trials because trials are what differentiates them from tyrants. Tyrants make the unilateral decision on who's innocent or guilty and don't give trials. The UN, which often opposes and sanctions tyrants, gives trials.
Ever heard of the Nuremberg trials? If they didn't deny Nazi war criminals a trial, then they're not going to deny Bucky a trial either. That's why the UN has an International Criminal Court.
So like I said, if Bucky was charged with terrorism, he was getting a trial in an international court. And if Bucky was charged with the murder of the Starks, he was getting a trial in a state court in the US. Either way, Bucky was going to get his day in court and his opportunity to present his alleged "brainwashing" defense in court to a jury. But Steve Rogers didn't want Bucky to go on trial because Steve Rogers is a selfish asshole and power-hungry tyrant who wants to be the sole judge and jury to decide who's innocent or guilty without any trial, exactly the way that a tyrant does.
Not if they intended to kill not capture him, which was the plan as is told to Steve by Sharon Carter and reiterated by SOS Ross to Tony later in the film, Bucky was meant to be eliminated not captured, and in a deleted scene for the movie Everett Ross is ordered to hand Bucky over to Wakanda where they would deal with him, which considering the new king of Wakanda had just attempted to murder Bucky himself seems unlikely he would receive a fair trial there either.
See I am citing actual evidence from the film or deleted scenes, actual part of the movies narrative and intent of the story, you are pulling out theoretical what if's and claiming them to be true and using real world instances which are themselves constantly contradicted, oh if they gave Nazi's trials why wouldn't they give him? Well they didn't try a shitload of muslims after 9/11 they just arrested them and held them indefinitely in a foreign country where they were tortured, both breaches in not only US but international law and go against the constitution of the US which you keep bringing up, these are real life things also, so why assume the movies US government officials who already assigned a kill order to Bucky wouldn't also try to usurp international laws and Bucky's human rights? See this is not inconsistent on my end, but on yours you pleb.