|
|
Post by njcardfan on Nov 20, 2019 1:13:59 GMT
It suggests a system because they still won 11 games after losing the player who is being argued as the best ever the drop off is pretty god damn minimal, especially when we are talking about the drop off in quarterback. If the difference between the greatest who has ever played and a footnote in NFL history is 18 and 1 to 10 and 5; then yes, that suggests a successful system. I get the argument for Brady being more important, but the idea that you could put anyone in Belichick's place and it wouldn't make a difference is as absurd as expecting that you could put anyone into Brady's place and they could replicate going 18 and 1. <snip>
You guys are making my argument for me. It's like Mike Trout. Mike Trout was good in high school, good enough to get scouted and drafted in the first round, but he wasn't best player on the planet good. Even his minor and fall league numbers are slightly above average. It wasn't until he came up when he started hitting homeruns. Anyhoo, as I stated above, Brady's numbers in college were pedestrian at best. Middle of the road. Then he comes to the NFL and becomes the GOAT. It's a mystery.
|
|
