Post by Waxer-n-boil on May 2, 2017 18:34:22 GMT
As for the verdict in the trial, the prosecution didn't present a strong case and Judge Ito disallowed some potential evidence that could've helped their case.
As for OJ being guilty, they proved his guilt in the civil case case. One of the particularly damning pieces of evidence was the bloody footprints of his shoes at the crime scene. The soles were from custom designer limited edition shoes. He was the only person in the state of California who owned a pair.
As for OJ being guilty, they proved his guilt in the civil case case. One of the particularly damning pieces of evidence was the bloody footprints of his shoes at the crime scene. The soles were from custom designer limited edition shoes. He was the only person in the state of California who owned a pair.