|
|
Post by moviebuffbrad on Dec 20, 2019 1:03:07 GMT
Also, cutting off and ignoring my whole argument before responding with yours - another great tactic. I'm writing this stuff down. Well, there's no argument. Everyone knows that Arthur Fleck nicely embodies the spirit and the characteristics of The Joker in his early phase of life. It's The Joker, not a deranged clown. That's it. There's no argument because that's not what I said. Quite the opposite. I'm saying he IS The Joker, and this IS a Batman movie because it's examining why criminals like Joker exists and thus why Batman exists, and why his methods are not the solution to Gotham's problems. I think the premise that Bruce and his family are in the movie as meaningless fan service and it should just be some Joker tale that exists in a vacuum is strange, and I'm trying to understand the thought process there.
|
|