|
|
Post by Mutant 77 on Dec 20, 2019 11:13:34 GMT
Well, there's no argument. Everyone knows that Arthur Fleck nicely embodies the spirit and the characteristics of The Joker in his early phase of life. It's The Joker, not a deranged clown. That's it. There's no argument because that's not what I said. Quite the opposite. I'm saying he IS The Joker, and this IS a Batman movie because it's examining why criminals like Joker exists and thus why Batman exists, and why his methods are not the solution to Gotham's problems. I think the premise that Bruce and his family are in the movie as meaningless fan service and it should just be some Joker tale that exists in a vacuum is strange, and I'm trying to understand the thought process there. Proper and legit. You're 100% right. I intercepted that.
|
|
