Post by poutinep on Jan 1, 2020 18:09:58 GMT
No it would not only be applicable if we recorded all of time. Dionysius Exiguus of Scythia Minor split 'all of time' into two halves by devising the dating system: BCE (BC) and CE (AD). Some point after that, some retard, or a group of retards, declared the first decade CE to be 1-9 and other retards (like you) decided that was OK.
Using that logic, one decade of this era ends up short a year, making it not an actual fucking decade.
2. 2001
3. 2002
4. 2003
5. 2004
6. 2005
7. 2006
8. 2007
9. 2008
10. 2009
---
11. 2010
12. 2011
13. 2012
14. 2013
15. 2014
16. 2015
17. 2016
18. 2017
19. 2018
20. 2019
We’re done here.
Go back decade by decade to the beginning of the era though. What's the first decade? Is it
1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. 4
5. 5
6. 6
7. 7
8. 8
9. 9
or is it
1. 1 BCE
2. 1 CE
3. 2 CE
4. 3 CE
5. 4 CE
6. 5 CE
7. 6 CE
8. 7 CE
9. 8 CE
10. 9 CE
or is it
1. 0 CE
2. 1 CE
3. 2 CE
4. 3 CE
5. 4 CE
6. 5 CE
7. 6 CE
8. 7 CE
9. 8 CE
10. 9 CE
?