|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Jan 20, 2020 2:02:35 GMT
Whether I agree with them or not, I can trust that both Maltin and Ebert at least watched the film in question. Other critics, like Rex Reed, it's a crapshoot. I found Pauline Kael perhaps the most interesting of reviewers. Again, I may not have agreed with her, but she was very intelligent and great at dissecting and expressing herself, that she could make it understandable and believable to buy into any reservations she had, even if one liked a film more than her. I guess she was more objective with her subjective take. Owned more of it from her own perspective for herself.
|
|
