Post by Sarge on Jan 29, 2020 3:03:51 GMT
One problem for me was that every article had unique details and there were accusations of journalistic sensationalism and lies so I tried to focus on commonalities which whittles away a lot. Then I think how do teenagers behave -- the location was remote, thinly populated, and not particularly good for skiing even though it was a ski trip. The group were close knit, highly intelligent, athletic, so probably overconfident and sexually active. Drugs are a strong likelihood although probably nothing common, they could do those closer to home and would have been recognized by rescue teams unless they lied about not finding any. One or more kids have a bad trip, things get out of hand, and once the tent is ripped people start dying.
The bear is a possibility, they leave food out, maybe someone gets up in the middle of the night and goes outside leaving the tent door open. The smell of food attracts an animal.
After the tent rips there is no use staying. People scatter, some try to walk out. The kids are either lost or afraid to return to the tent. One article says they built a snow cave but didn't stay in it. The bashed up bodies were those found months later after being exposed to nature and animals.
The bear is a possibility, they leave food out, maybe someone gets up in the middle of the night and goes outside leaving the tent door open. The smell of food attracts an animal.
After the tent rips there is no use staying. People scatter, some try to walk out. The kids are either lost or afraid to return to the tent. One article says they built a snow cave but didn't stay in it. The bashed up bodies were those found months later after being exposed to nature and animals.