Post by Eva Yojimbo on Feb 5, 2020 13:40:45 GMT
I've refuted #1 many times myself on these boards. You linked to one website offering a rebuttal; I like this one because it analyzes it using the mathematical basis for what evidence is: www.lesswrong.com/posts/mnS2WYLCGJP2kQkRn/absence-of-evidence-is-evidence-of-absence
As for #3, I'd say they're different fields of study on a contiguous subject. It's not unlike saying Cosmology is no different than Physics. One might could say both Cosmology and Abiogenesis are very specific types of Evolution and Physics; namely, how both got started.
As for #3, I'd say they're different fields of study on a contiguous subject. It's not unlike saying Cosmology is no different than Physics. One might could say both Cosmology and Abiogenesis are very specific types of Evolution and Physics; namely, how both got started.