|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Feb 12, 2020 23:29:33 GMT
I'd have no real problem with that, but they would need to change the title of the award from "best picture" to "best picture in the English language" Then they'd obviously get vilified for not allowing "foreigners" to be included in their top prize. So, no, it ain't going to happen. It's a global film awards ceremony.
That's just the thing - it isn't really THE global film awards, is it? The Academy loves to sell it as such, but it is and it has always been the Hollywood award, with a few token nominations and wins to non-English language movies over the years just to keep the illusion going that it's THE global award and therefore the ultimate measuring stick for film quality - and if French, Japanese, Italian, Russian, Mexican and Indian movies never win, well, that's just because they are not as good as Hollywood movies, isn't it? That is what the Academy wants people all over the world to believe.
I loved Parasite (although not as much as "1917") and I watch tons of international films every year, but I hated that "Parasite" won. I don't want film fans to think of the Oscars as the World film awards. I don't want Brazilian fans dismissing French or Japanese movies because "if they were any good, how come they weren't even nominated for the Oscars".
The transparency of the phony, hypocritical Academy is astounding. Now that a foreign film has won best picture, it must BE the measuring stick of quality. It is like Joaquin Phoenix's recent award winning speeches, wanting others to know how wonderful he is and to make sure we know he's not racist, sexist and pro-vegan, pro-climate change et all, but the rest of us are just despicable. My, how grandstandingly virtuous of him, not to mention "Joker like" and that is scary that these posturing clowns think they are the voice of reason.
|
|