Post by Arlon10 on Feb 23, 2020 10:21:08 GMT
I think what often happens here is that people who follow these things are familiar with the type of problem and understand the English shorthand better than people who are not familiar. Same thing with the Monty Hall problem, it escapes the attention of some people that the host's choice is not random and how important that is.
I also notice Bayes' Theorem was not used. Nor do I believe anyone could use Bayes' Theorem without solving the problem otherwise first.
I realize some of you don't care what I think. Don't then.
Bayes's Theorem was used here: IMDB2.freeforums.net/post/3693057/thread That's precisely what I used to solve the problem well before dividavi (in a PM I sent to Aj). Phludowin and general313 also did so before him. I can screenshot these solutions with timestamps if you don't believe me.
Here's a probability question for you, "What is the probability timestamps from this forum reflect real life sequences of events?" For 30,000 people? For 300 people? For 3 people? For one person with 3 socks?
Here's another question. Link. Go ahead and answer it. I won't be upset if you get the answer right. It's not as difficult as it is fascinating.

