|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Mar 18, 2020 20:05:27 GMT
Anytime you want to dispute my post from the previous page or the post I linked to in said post, I'm ready. Let's have a real conversation featuring genuine facts. Who was the best QB Brady faced when he was whooping up on the NFC South during his entire career? I hope you respond to this, I really do. Well, speaking as someone who is unbiased, the Patriots did play in the weakest division in NFL for the last decade and it benefited them greatly. Yeah, it helped that they were focused, and prepared, and had "the greatest QB of all time", but to say playing in a weak division didn't have any part in their dominance over that division is laughable. The other AFC East teams were largely garbage or just ok. Only six times did a team in the east win more than eight games. Only four times did an east team get to the playoffs. If any of the other AFC East teams were able to consistently trot out a quality team, then I doubt the Patriots would've won the division as many times as they did. I'm really not trying to discredit the Patriots success any. I'm just saying that they were aided by playing in a division that was terrible for pretty much the entire decade. And the Jets went to the AFC Championship twice in a row, while the Patriots kept on posting winning seasons. The NFC South takes turns having 6-10 seasons while the bum of the month makes a Super Bowl (and loses to the Patriots) every ten years and immediately sinks back into mediocrity. I posted the Patriots record vs. the NFC South in a previous post. That says it all. There's no way around it, which is why you chose not to address it. Look at those numbers along with their overall winning percentage in and out of the division since 2003. Case closed.
|
|
