|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on May 19, 2020 11:31:31 GMT
They are your personal subjective reasons to use as a buffer only about those that don’t side with you. How can you possibly claim someone is guilty and ignorant about your belief, when you aren’t offering anything to make sense about what they are supposed to be ignorant and guilty of. Setting aside what he does believe, why don't you accept that what you think he believes is your mistake when you are told? More nonsense. I don't need to think about his belief, other than what he means by it, especially since he has expounded on it.
His belief is his, but if he cares enough to express it, he has to own his own pov when challenged about it. He needs to accept that he can't assume that others are guilty and ignorant over not having religion, (his words), unless he can back it up with something valid and reasonable about what he is trying to say, otherwise he is best perhaps not saying anything.
|
|