|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on May 20, 2020 5:34:58 GMT
I haven’t read all the posts, but I don’t think anyone has put it that way. If the belief in religion or God is comfortable with you fine, I have just been curious as to why you take the stance you do with “assuming” that others are feeling guilty and are ignorant, based on what you hang your notion on about religion and God and if you are being challenged or attacked. The posters that have largely been engaging with you are not ignorant, nor are they guilty of any fallacy over religious belief, they just want proof or evidence of this belief that you have shared that doesn’t make sense to a logical and rational mind. Especially when you claim the belief is better to have than have not, as a condition of “just in case”. For the millionth time --- there's no proof. That is why it makes no sense to a rational mind. There also has to be proof of your wild claims of guilt and ignorance towards them not believing in religion. If you can't say why, or come up with something that reasonable, it just isn't going to wash. Do you want for others to believe in what you do?
|
|