Post by blockbusted on Jun 20, 2020 2:45:38 GMT


Just curious thought, if you don't mind me asking what makes Zack Snyder's deconstruction of, say, Superman unforgivable and disgusting but Rian Johnson's deconstruction of Luke Skywalker in The Last Jedi a breath of fresh air? Just curious, as we talked about that movie not too long ago and I've noticed you are not too keen on Zack Snyder's treatment of DC on film.
I think the difference in Snyder's depiction of superheroes and Johnson's depiction of Luke is tone. TLJ is sympathetic to Luke's character - it builds on themes from Lucas' prequel trilogy that the Jedi were arrogant and fell due to their own hubris - but ultimately it shows his nihilistic attitude is wrong and he must step up at the end. Snyder on the other hand worships and ferishizes the grizzly violence of his superheroes. Snyder essentially said Batman's No Kill rule is for "virgins", and he'll misconstrue scenes from the comics to back up Batman being a sadistic prick. It's apparent that Superman fucking up Metropolis was repurposed as bad in BvS. No one comments on the collateral damage in MoS itself, and Supes is back to destroying shit in BvS, the areas are just conveniently "abandoned". Snyder and his fans bent over backwards defending the Zod kill, Snyder basically saying that's when Superman decides never to kill again. Then, first 15 minutes of BvS: he drives an African warlord through 8 walls. I think any "deconstruction" is probably just reading too much into things. Snyder, director of 300, just likes his badass killers.

